Gray Tree Frogs

On Saturday night may 11 Michael Bradlee and I went to the NBG to see if the Tree Frogs were mating.  The drainage swale had filled up this week with the rains for the first time in a month.  Friday night we heard nothing, but as soon as we got there on the 11th, about 8:10 PM, the sounds were unmistakeable.  I got about 11 minutes of audio (too dark for the visuals to show anything) and I have listened to it.  At the pond it was nearly hypnotic, but on tape does not have the same power.

 

But all in all a good sign for the project as it means we should have tadpoles soon.  I will check again on rainy nights to see if there is any other mating.  it seems like there were about 10 frogs just from locations around the pond, but really hard to tell.  In the dim light you could see occasionally frogs swimming, or at least the ripples in the water from frogs swimming, but none of it showed up on the video.

 

After I left the small pond I went to the larger pond and recorded a few bullfrog calls.

Turtles

May 10,  went to NBG about 7:30 AM.  The tadpole drainage swale filled yesterday in the rains.  Not completely, but pretty well.  Remains to be seen if the Gray Tree Frogs will use it this year.  it is much later than last year’s breeding already as there were tadpoles swimming by this time in 2012.

 

At the big pond I got my first film of a large bullfrog.  I would like to  see how that looks on  a larger screen.  I also got lots of turtle video and counted the colony.  13, Which is the most I have seen on any day this year.  I also tried to film a swallow flying around, that ought to be ridiculously out of focus and off target but it was just wave the camera in the general direction  of a fast moving target and hope that you caught something occasionally.

 

My goal for the next week is to put today’s video, especially the turtles, into one two minute video and get it posted.  Means I have to learn how to edit and post.  time for a new skill.

New things to read

The Prosperity For RI project is heating up, and this week I found articles on the ridiculousness of the business climate game, more folks writing about the end of growth and sustainable prosperity, and some work on true cost accounting and externalities.  I have some serious reading to do over the next few weeks.

Jellyfish

The lower Moshassuck has had some interesting wildlife this week.  The Rough winged swallows are swooping, I have seen several (maybe the same one multiple times) schools of some sort of bottom feeding fish, and for the first time ever I saw a Jellyfish in the Moshassuck on thursday May 2.  It was in the stretch of river just north of the Citizens Bank Building.

At the North Burial Ground the turtles are out, saw a Great Blue Heron (got some video) and was told of a coyote sighting.  The drainage pond that normally hosts Gray Tree Frogs is completely dry, so I have no idea if there will be a breeding season.  Just waiting for rain.

Moshassuck wildlife

Just a quick update on various wildlife sightings in the Moshassuck watershed this spring. 9 turtles at the large pond in the north Burial Ground.  Turtles also seen at Galego Court pond.

 

Bull frogs seen at large pond in NBG, but no bullfrog tadpoles yet.

Merganser and Black Crowned Night Heron in the river along Canal St, Rough winged swallows just to the north on both sides of Smith St.

One school of fairly large bottom feeders (probably carp) next to Citizens Bank.

 

The Moshassuck wildlife video project will focus on Gray Tree Frogs but they have not appeared yet.  Have taken video footage of painted turtles, a bit of muskrat footage, and some footage of geese and ducks.  No bullfrog footage yet either.

Greg’s 60th Birthday Conference and Extravaganza The Basics

Ecological healing, Ecological Economics, Economic Justice:  Creating Prosperity for the 99% in Rhode Island

Saturday October 12, 2013 beginning at 10 AM, running until 5 PM
Location  Pawtucket Armory 172 Exchange St   Pawtucket Rhode Island the home of the Industrial Revolution
Keynoter  Margaret Flowers    Its our Economy
Cost  $35.00 going up to $40 on September 15  Sponsors welcome.
The conference will be immediately followed at 5:30 by dinner and a dance party from 5:30 to 9:30 PM in the same location
Cost  $35.00  going up to $40.00 on September 15  Sponsors welcome.
If you would like to come to both parts of the day the cost is $50.00   going up to $60 on September 15  Sponsorships start at $100
Note that your presence is important and if the cost of the events is too much for your budget, let me know and we can work something out.
The host organization is The Environmental Justice League of Rhode Island
Sponsors
Sponsorships start at $100 with a listing in  the program stating  ”I am standing with Greg for Environmental and Economic Justice on his birthday”
Other levels of sponsorship will be acknowledged appropriately.   I am hoping many of you receiving this will wish to help sponsor the conference.
To register
Email Greg Gerritt       gerritt@mindspring.com       with contact information, which parts of the day you wish to attend and if you wish to be a sponsor.
Payment
Checks made out to the Environmental Justice League of RI  (EJLRI is fine) can be mailed to Greg Gerritt   37 6th St  Providence RI 02906
Or  pay on line at             http://ejlri.wordpress.com/donate-now/
If you can not attend, you are encouraged to donate to the EJLRI in my honor.
Note, Most of the proceeds will be used to help keep the work of the Environmental Justice League of Rhode island moving forward. 25% of the net proceeds will be donated to Groundwork Providence.  Another organization doing great work in the community that I am proud to be affiliated with.
The keynote speaker
 
 

Margaret Flowers, co-director of Its Our Economy, is a Maryland pediatrician. After graduation from the University of Maryland School of Medicine in 1990 and completion of pediatric residency at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Flowers worked first as a hospitalist and then in private practice. She left practice in 2007 to advocate full-time for a single payer health care system at both the state and national levels.

 

The World Bank sort of figures it out

 

April 2, 2013   The World Bank sort of figures it out      Greg Gerritt
Ursula K. LeGuin, one of my favorite authors, creates in her fiction alien worlds that are not quite so alien, based on real ecological principles and a real understanding of human behavior.  One of her books is titled “The Word for World is Forest”.  Earth is not quite like that, though as a native of the forests of northeastern North America, it is easy to imagine a world of forests despite my urban childhood.    It is also important to remember that the reforesting of the planet is going to be one of our key tools in mitigating and adapting to climate change and maintaining food security.
I transferred out of forestry school when i was 18 because I figured out that the forestry school at the University of Maine had no more interest in forest, ecosystem, or community health than the corporate forest overlords who had paid for the brand new Forest Resources building on campus.  I had figured out that to keep the forests healthy we needed to focus more on what people did than the minutia of corporate forestry so it was time to change majors.  I spent the next 25 years in the woods, managing a woodlot,  keeping my eyes open, gardening, building things of wood, reading quite a bit.  My last woods job was as the Research Director and forest tour guide for the first Ban Clearcutting referendum in Maine in 1996.  It was fun going on speaking tour in rural Maine and noting that 25 years earlier I had left forestry school because the U of Maine was not protecting the forest, and they still were not.  We lost that referendum campaign, but we were right about what was happening in the Maine woods, and today the forest based industries in Maine are cutting a lot less wood than they were in the 1990′s.  They had no choice.    My forest work these days is part of a larger practice focused on the ecology/economy interface.  It includes reforesting a vacant lot down by the river as a long term experiment in suppression of invasive weeds and participating in the newly forming Providence Urban Tree Alliance.
With this background I occasionally find myself reading things like Managing Forest Resources for Sustainable Development: An Evaluation of World Bank Group Experience, prepared by the Independent Evaluation Group, distributed internally on December 28, 2012 which supposedly was discussed at a meeting of the Committee on Development Effectiveness scheduled for February 2013.   The World Bank wants to know if it successfully implemented its 2002 forest strategy.
For many activists the World Bank has been one of the bad guys of the planet, doing all it can to keep corporate globalism growing, while occasionally paying lip service to ending poverty and protecting the environment.  Therefore the World Bank document is in some ways rather remarkable.  It clearly states that the representatives of the global ruling elite who operate the World Bank have figured out one of the important things to do to keep ecosystems that feed us healthy on planet Earth, and to prevent rural poverty from getting worse, is to ensure that the communities of people who live in the forest maintain their traditional control of the land and its resources. It seems like every time big money or urban interests get control of the forest it is destroyed in the name of getting richer faster. The World Bank staff have determined that when forests are destroyed the poorest of the poor suffer the most, and that the livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people who live in and depend upon the forest are at risk. The data, a review of their own studies by an internal review team, clearly demonstrates that by every human and ecological indicator, places where the community maintained control of the forests they depended upon were healthier.
While it is cool that the World Bank is ahead of the corporate elite in my neighborhood in its understanding of the ecology/economy interface, my reaction to the World Bank’s epiphany about the relationship between ecology, democracy, and economy is more in the what took you so damned long vein, But it is another example of how the reality on Earth is catching up to the corporate global system. It is now clear that the World Bank professional staff is starting to figure out the inextricable link between ecosystem health, democracy, economic equality, and the prosperity of human communities,   I started using the slogan “you can not heal ecosystems without ending poverty, you can not end poverty without healing ecosystems” about 15 years ago, so even in the 2002 strategy document the World Bank was playing catch up to what many of us had already figured out.
Despite being late to the table, the World Bank report is remarkable enough that probably the best way to give the reader the flavor is to simply quote a few passages and  provide minimalist annotation.
WB   From the cover letter of the document
The World Bank Group’s forest interventions have contributed substantially to environmental outcomes, but
poverty reduction, for the most part, has not been adequately addressed. Projects that promote participatory forest
management have been the most successful at balancing poverty reduction and environmental aims but this
integration is lacking in other interventions.
GG  The WB has helped ecosystem health by helping to create protected areas, but overall they have financed more damage than healing.  But the finding that community involvement in decisions is crucial, both ecologically and economically, is useful.
WB    From the overview   page XV

the intrinsic characteristics of
forests make sustainable management a
challenge. The positive externalities forests
provide are uncertain, diffuse, and hard to
value. When ignored by decision-makers, the
magnitude of private net benefits of
deforestation can seem to outweigh the public
benefits of conservation or sustainable
management. As a result, deforestation and
degradation continue without much
compensating gain for economic development
or poverty reduction.

WB   1.4  page 2    ”Poor forest  governance stems from the fact that forests often have a combination of capturable wealth but poor, isolated, and powerless residents. Powerful interest groups can seize this wealth, depriving poor people of access to forest resources, and sometimes contributing to corruption and poor governance at the national level. Because it is more profitable to mine the forest than to manage it sustainably, this contributes  also to environmental damage.

 

GG   Outside interests are good at stealing forests from their inhabitants.  They have been doing this since the beginning of cities as one can not grow cities without a ready supply of wood, wood that normally is in the hands of the people who already live in the forest.  The routine is to kill, displace, or enslave the forest people and cut down the forest.  Now it is done in the name of economic growth instead of Manifest Destiny, or some other appeal to nationalism,  but the result is the  same.  Forest dwellers die or are displaced and the corrupt elite gets richer.

In my city we do not face an exactly analogous situation, rarely are their weapons involved, but what  environmental justice communities in the US deal with comes from exactly the same impulses.   Communities are run over, to their detriment ecologically, socially, financially.  They are run over for exactly the same reasons communities in the forest are run over, and the remedy of allowing the communities control over their assets instead of assets being controlled by outside forces is exactly what helps communities become more prosperous.  Whether you learn this coming at it from the forest or coming from brownfield communities you end up in the same place.  Democracy, especially in the development process, is a critical factor if our work is to lead to ecological healing and to prosperity in low income communities..

WB  2.58  page 45   Evidence is lacking that the World Bank‘s support for industrial timber
concession reform has led to sustainable and inclusive economic development. As
stated by in recent analytical work, —over the past sixty years, there is little evidence
that industrial timber production has lifted rural populations out of poverty or
contributed in other meaningful and sustainable ways to local and national
development
GG   Having lived in Maine where Industrial Timber Concessions have been important since 1820 I am glad the WB has finally figured this out.  Timber concessions lead to massive ecological destruction, and impoverish communities.  The WB should just remove industrial concessions from their tool kit, and only finance community based development.  And the use of forest concessions should be more than sufficient to label a country an ecological pirate and remove their forest products and the products created on the destroyed forest lands, from global commerce.
WB 2.62  page 48     World Bank policy advice and project-level aims that have supported the reform of industrial timber concession regimes have neglected or underestimated the nontimber values and uses of the forests, with respect to the livelihoods of forest-dependent people, their sociocultural values, and their sense of security. Except in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Bank has not systematically analyzed the economic and sociocultural trade-offs associated with this model before implementing its projects, including: the employment potential of small-scale forest enterprises (versus large-scale logging), the potential loss of forest-related incomes (through the loss of nontimber forest products), disruption of food and fuel security, or effects on sociocultural or religious practices and norms

 

GG  The World Bank, and everyone else seem to always underestimate how valuable the forest (or the equivalent ecosystems in non forested places)  is to the people who live there, and are finally coming to the realization that wholesale stripping of forests provides little of value to communities or governments, while making a fortune for the corrupt few.  I hope they put their money where their mouth is.

WB   Box 2.7  page 49     In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the World Bank supported a well-received and often cited piece of economic sector work, Forests in Post-Conflict DRC: Analysis of a Priority Agenda (2007), which demonstrated that domestic uses of the forest for fuel wood, bush meat, other forest foods, and medicines rank higher than timber in annual economic value. The total market value of both fuel wood production and bush meat was estimated to be over $2 billion, while the economic value of watershed protection was considered to be on the order of $100 million to $1 billion. In comparison, the total market value of both formal and informal timber was estimated at only $160 million. Even if timber production were to increase in the future, the report argues, it was likely to remain modest compared to the value other forest goods and services. Concluding that there was —an opportunity for developing new forest uses and financing systems beyond the usual models of timber production, parks, agriculture and small-scale harvesting by communities and local enterprises, the report argued for a turn toward multipurpose land use planning in place of the industrial timber concessions that dominated in the past.

GG    Yup.  It is crazy to trade $3 billion dollars a year of value to the many for $160 million a year pocketed by the few.

WB   2.79  page 56   The focus on engaging local resource users in decision-making is a vital element of resource management that holds potential for increasing synergy among
the three pillars. Increased local participation in environmental management is
viewed as a means to eliminate inefficiency and corruption in administration of the
forestry sector while enhancing equity in the distribution of economic benefits.
WB  2.82  page 57   Across the World Bank forest-related projects in the Sahel, the failure to explicitly address asymmetrical power relationships between decentralized bodies and forestry agents islikely to reduce the ability of local groups to actually exercise decision-making power in forest management.

 

GG  Ecological healing and economic justice are simply two sides of the same coin, and putting them into practice is what allows prosperity in marginalized communities. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Picket in their 2009 book “The Spirit Level” include graphs that clear show that by every measure, including ecologically, a community is better off if there is less economic inequality, and of course economic equality is only possible with political equality.  Here in Rhode Island developers are constantly trying to reduce the power of low income communities in the development arena.  Given the lack of economic success in RI, we might need to consider that giving low income communities more power might be a better approach to creating prosperity.

WB  Box 4.2  page 90    Global Partnership for  Forest Landscape   with support from PROFOR.

The main finding was an  exciting one: About 2 billion hectares of degraded and lost forest lands are suitable for restoration. Of those, about 1.5 billion hectares would be best-suited for mosaic restoration, in which forests and trees are combined with other land uses, including agroforestry, smallholder agriculture, and settlements. These are also the landscapes with a high potential impact on poverty reduction.

 

This message resonated particularly strongly with the Bank because of its own successful experience on the Loess Plateau in China, one of the largest integrated landscape restoration projects in the world, where terracing, natural tree regeneration, tree planting and managed grazing have resulted in increased yields, incomes and food security, as well as improved resilience, carbon sequestration and erosion control. Today this shift in management attitudes toward forests and agriculture is very palpable inthe Bank and has contributed to steer discussion on climate change toward more cross-sectoral, landscape based approaches (minding the + in REDD+, supporting climate-smart agriculture, etc).

—The fates of forests and agriculture are bound together…Forests cannot be sustained if people are hungry or the governance of natural resources is inadequate. This was widely quoted in blogs and media stories, and echoed in what other participants said in their presentations and speeches. There is a growing consensus among agencies, researchers, donors and policy makers that forest issues cannot be dealt with in isolation and that tackling deforestation is best done within an integrated landscape approach that builds on the huge opportunities for —triple wins∥ (income and food security, adaptation and mitigation).

 

GG    You can not end poverty without healing ecosystems, you can not heal ecosystems without ending poverty, and you will not do either until we shut down the military industrial complex that is at the heart of the inequality on the planet and uses violence to remove the original inhabitants from the forests of the world.  That we need an integrated approach to communities, ecosystems, economies, and that we need to use the appropriate scale for all of the work we do, should be old hat,  but it is very difficult for the people in decision making roles to do that.  A recent RI conference on the economy was filled with wealthy developers who were quite adamant that communities and rules to protect communities are obstacles to development, when the truth is that communities do not want to be looted.

 

WB     4.24   Page 93   In addition to the credits, an area has been transformed from a degraded landscape to a lush forested one, bringing a number of benefits such as reduced erosion, increased biodiversity and improvements in income for the communities involved in the project. The project has adapted techniques demonstrated in West Africa to promote natural regeneration of woodlands and has restored more than 2,700 hectares of degraded land. The regeneration project has reportedly resulted in increased production of honey, fruit, and fodder and has provided alternative livelihoods for a number of project beneficiaries

GG  Ecological healing must be part of every development plan on the planet if we intend to eradicate poverty.

WB   4.30     page     94   A recent evaluation of the program (Blomley 2012) found that, while highly relevant, the program‘s effectiveness at the country level varied greatly between countries, especially in the extent to which the results of the participatory consultation processes were able to influence policy and catalyze legal reforms. Its main success at the country level was in —engaging new—and in many cases marginalized—voices within forest dialogue processes.∥ At the global level, the program succeeded in, among other things, identifying and defining a new concept—Investing in Locally Controlled Forests (ILCF)—which is increasingly being adopted by the Bank and the FAO. However, efficiency was undermined by a heavy administrative and financial burden under the Development Grant Facility and complex systems at the country level—in particular in terms of funding and reporting.

 

GG  Investing in Locally Controlled Forests is the only forest projects the WB should be involved with.

 

WB    4.35  page 96    Similarly, it is to be expected that there will continue to be some level of friction between the Bank and some client country governments in using some of the approaches and knowledge products developed through the partnerships given their strong advocacy nature, for example, regarding equity, indigenous and local community rights, and actions to combat corruption and illegality.

 

GG   More business as usual.

WB    5.5  Page 100 The evolution of   the partnerships towards holistic landscape-level approaches that combine forest conservation and SFM with climate change mitigation and adaptation, improved food security and climate smart agricultural development are important achievements. The Bank‘s efforts to integrate broader governance concerns and issues, including the efforts to protect and enhance the rights of indigenous forest-dependent communities, into these approaches are also recognized as important  achievements.

 

GG   The WB acknowledges that the corrupt elites ruling most of the world are going to resist, but ecological healing, community control, and ending poverty are inextricably linked and must be practiced on a large scale as well as village by village if we are to keep Earth a safe place to live.

 

WB 5.8  page 101   Expand support for participatory forest management with help to level the playing field for community based forest enterprises by working with clients to improve regulations and procedures and integrate small scale informal forestry activities.

GG     I appreciate this one, it is the WB saying we have been complicit with dictators and racist destruction of forest communities because we think the global capitalist game is the only alternative. Despite all of the evidence pointing out that global capitalism is killing the planet and many people, the WB continues to be a participant in the big time game, so if it  decides to alter the rules, it has some amount of leverage to deal with dictators and greed heads to protect a little forest and some forest people, and occasionally it will do it because the number crunchers finally agree it is the best alternative.
Conclusion
Lo and behold, the World Bank speaks of justice and ecology as integral to the economy, and that the WB and forest communities will get better results if the World Bank and the projects it funds put into practice what they have learned.  Unfortunately change is slow and the powerful are unmoved until we move them.  In the same vein it will be difficult to bring the knowledge the World Bank and researchers and activists around the world have gained in this study to the redevelopment of old industrial places like Rhode Island.  We are not usually dealing with ethnic communities that have 1000 year roots in the place they live, though often we are working in communities of recent immigrants who differ ethnically from those who lived in the neighborhood when it was an economic powerhouse, and therefore have about as much power as the forest people.  The knowledge that it is only via taking care ecologically, being aware of power relationships, and implementing systems that equalize the power and give communities members a real say and stake in the outcome is hard for the global and local elites to swallow.  But in Rhode Island (and many other places) we will have prosperous communities only when we recognize the 50 years of thrashing for growth that failed specifically because it ignored these principles.

Response to Dean Baker op ed March 19, 2013

I question the assumption that there will be economic growth and rising wages. We are already into ecological collapse and the path to prosperity is ecological healing and economic justice. If incomes around the global equalize, as they must in a just world, and if we reduce consumption to keep the worst of climate change from happening and restore the forests, we can use less and enjoy community more.

As for healthcare, it is the biggest cause of bankruptcy in the US, and only through single payer can we stop the crazy idea that we should use the medical industrial complex as an engine of economic growth. All that does is make health care unaffordable.  Good sewers and no more toxic chemicals in our food and water will provide for greater community health than the most high tech system money can buy.

A handout for the General Treasurer March 2013

The original impetus for this meeting came about when during the 2010 campaign I was at several events you were at and I thought that it would be good to have a conversation with you about my work on prosperity and the ecology /economy interface. It took this long for the follow up.  It is clear the last 50 years have not been the best for the  RI economy using traditional measures.  But it is also clear that the approach to economic development  that has been used the last 50 years is tied to a system that is failing the people of Rhode Island and has been relatively unresponsive to changes in the conditions on planet Earth.  Economic planning is based on the assumption of fast continuous growth forever.  It is my contention that growth is essentially dead in the industrial world, the conditions required for rapid growth do not exist, and that efforts to create rapid economic growth are likely to lead for a further deterioration of the conditions in our communities.  Our communities would be better served by a smart shrinkage of the economy.   It should be noted that nearly all of the low unemployment states are seeing booming employment from industries that contribute to more rapid climate change and the polluting of waters.

In regard to investments for state pension funds, one of your primary responsibilities, there are several points.  There is a growing separation between the things one would do to get higher returns on investments and what is good for the community.  A stock market valuation growing much more rapidly than the employment, and 121% of all the income gain in 2011 going to 1% of the population are merely exclamation points in this long term trend.    Investing in off shoring, investing in businesses cutting corners, investing in the destruction of ecosystems may bring the returns needed to meet investment targets (though those targets have not been met for at least 5 years) but they are not helping Rhode Islanders except for a relatively small group of retirees.  The expected returns are unrealistic except by investing in the most destructive economic practices, such as fracking, and make the overall economic situation in RI worse,  Of special note for environmentalists is that returns on investment faster than the ecosystem can operate always lead to destruction of forests, soils, and fisheries.  The forest in New England grows about 3% a year and cutting it faster than that (which a higher rate of return to investors seems to demand)  depletes the forest, harms the water, increases flooding, destroys fisheries.  Economists do not normally make that connection, but they should,

Investing directly in ecological healing in Rhode Island creates more jobs in Rhode Island with widespread benefits to communities and the economy, and even a lower rate of return on these investments than Wall St offers would provide more of a boost to Rhode Island than a higher rate of return from Wall St.  it is a bit of a different approach to prudent man investing, but in the long run more prudent.

Economic justice, a more equal economy, is inextricably linked to prosperity and ecological health.  Where the people have the right to stop inappropriate development or prevent their poisoning the health and conversely direct what kind of development is appropriate in the community, the prosperity of the community improves.  When communities have no say, when the economy skews toward the rich, when communities are uprooted for private gain and at public cost, communities become less prosperous.  The result of the skewing of the economy is always faster resource depletion, lower incomes, lower public health, shorter lives and less democracy.  The best examples of doing it right are starting to emerge in the tropics, where according to the World Bank,  when communities retain control of their forest the health of the forest is maintained while the lowest income people in the community eat better and have higher incomes than similar communities that lose control of the forest to outside logging interests.

Full cost accounting is the idea of counting all relevant information, not just the flows of money in determining what is going on economically.  Too often we count resource depletion and other damage to our communities as a growth in the economy.  Is repairing hurricane damage really something to be added to the economy, or should it be subtracted from he planetary budget as it furthers resource depletion to have to rebuild stuff that probably was in the wrong place all together, and incurs great societal liabilities if rebuilt .

I am happy to follow up further and provide references.  And I invite you to a conference on October 12 2013  Entitled    ”Ecological Healing, Ecological Economics, Economic Justice:  Creating Prosperity for the 99% in Rhode Island”

Greg Gerritt     Prosperity For RI.com

 

 

Response to essay in ecoRI March 2013

As a person who is involved in efforts to boost local sustainability and agriculture, and who studies the economy extensively, part of my work is challenging the paradigm of development that has as its primary goal to keep the 1% fat and happy. The prosperity we seek can not come via the development philosophy and practices that have mismanaged the economy of RI for 50 years.

With the changed conditions on planet Earth, climate change, depletion of resources, collapsing ecosystems, as well as an economy that no longer creates middle class jobs due to advances in technology, and runs entirely on excessive consumption with borrowed money, a report like the one the Fourth Economy Consulting team produced is in the long line of reports that postulates this or that hot economic cluster with some hot technology that moves people out of the job market is the thing RI should chase.

We might want to remember that in the US all of the economic growth is funny money financial speculation money that only goes to the 1%. The rest of us are already getting poorer, and will continue to do so as the global economy flattens out and sputters as the trees run out. Therefore we need much more of our economy in areas sheltered from the global economy and capable of producing more jobs meeting local needs for productive work that heals ecosystems. Any plan that does not include agriculture as a growing force in RI is not worth the paper it is printed on, and shows the complete poverty of the economic model the 1% continue to insist is the only possible future.

 

Late winter musings

Writing on a rainy late winter morning.  The days are getting longer, it is light at 6 AM.  This rain will take much of what is left of the snow.  I have been very focused on events and meetings and not done much writing recently.  But I have been pondering what to say to Gina Raimondo at the meeting in 10 days.  I know i can not give her the full force of my assault on Wall St, so I have to be very clear, concise, and laid back that day.

I had a piece of it walking last night, see if I can reconstruct it.  if not today, tomorrow. I have to convey the relationship between the end of growth except for the funny money growth of the 1%, using the statistic from 2011 that the 1% received 121% of the rise in income that year while the rest of us, the 99% on average received 0.4% LESS income. So an investment strategy that focuses on growth like the stock market saw in 2012, about 6% then becomes the target for pension fund investments, investments that make money for the pension fund while at the same time harming the average Rhode Islander and contributing to excessive consumption on planet earth.  That a better strategy might be investing directly in the state in adaptation to climate change such as decentralized power, much more local agriculture.  Maybe in farmland to get new farmers into business.

I think I am going to have just about that much time.  I need to make swift concise points. No more than 5, 3 is better but not enough to make a circle. Can I include the end of growth?  The end of growth for who?  Are we headed for the next bubble? How wasteful are those?   Who benefits from bubbles are the rich. The end of more jobs with this phony growth unless we practice more economic justice and equity.  Can i convey the spirit level stuff about how clear the evidence is that economic inequality is bad for an economy, and really works less well as we approach a steady state and begin the shrinkage.  Can we shrink smart, can we accept interest and return rates at ecological speed.   2%

Can we start to account for ecology and community in our measures, using full cost accounting in our investment policies. Could we do more good here with smaller returns? Improve the situation of our citizenry, improve gross state happiness with a more level economy?  Using ecological healing as a way forward?

Not going to get to all of that.  maybe this week i write one of these  a day.  See how well I can hone the elevator pitch.

 

 

 

disconnected by snow plowing

I live right off one of the oldest roads in North America.  North Main St was originally the foot path used by the people of the Narragansett nation  traveling  between the confluence of the rivers in what became downtown Providence and the settlement at the falls at Pawtucket.  The reason N Main has been used by people walking the approximately 4 miles from Providence to Pawtucket for so long is  that it takes you out of the Moshassuck valley at a relatively easy place to climb up to the terrace, keeps you out of the swamps and the up and down terrain of what became the North Burial Ground, and then crosses the divide in to the Blackstone watershed at the easiest place to walk over the ridge.  Considering how long people have been walking this trail it is rather ironic and sad that when it snows the route along N Main and at its southern end Canal St is not passable to pedestrians.  The road is plowed, the traffic moves, but long stretches of it are either unshoveled or have their connectivity blocked by mounds of snow at the corners or next to driveways.

For pedestrians throughout Providence and surrounding urban communities the connectivity is broken in the snow due to the accommodations to the cars that are one of the key components in the global weirding bringing us these crazy storms,    It appears the neighborhoods are accessible, with more shoveled sidewalks, more corner cut throughs, and less crowded streets, but the connections between the neighborhoods, and the areas between the neighborhoods and downtown, especially some of bridges over the Interstate which seem to be orphans, are rather weak.  It happens that the overpass on Broad St was shoveled, but then,  and I found this in many places today, when the plows came back to widen the streets, it pushed snow back onto the shoveled out sidewalks.

Being the obligatory walker I know routes that expose me to less traffic, I avoid most of N Main St, traveling up on the hill rather than the old road I can get to downtown in one piece.   But if we are to be a walkable city, we are going to have to strike a new balance between opening the way for cars, and keeping the old trail accessible to people on foot.

Compost Op Ed published in Projo Feb. 13, 2013

The promise of composting in R.I.
GREG GERRITT
By almost any indicator the Rhode Island economy is not performing all that well. The indicator I tend to focus on is food security. And in Rhode Island too many kids go hungry. The only way we are really going to reduce childhood hunger and food insecurity is to provide the opportunity for almost every family in Rhode Island to grow more food. The record is clear. Compared to their neighbors in similar straits, families with community garden plots have healthier kids, who are eating more nutritiously.
To increase gardening Rhode Island needs a key ingredient — one that we could produce in abundance if we quit tossing it into the state Central Landfill. Agriculture only thrives with a ready supply of compost and to produce that ready supply Rhode Island should quit tossing food scrap into the landfill and start composting it in backyards, community settings, and commercial scale facilities.
Currently Rhode island tosses away about 250 tons of food scrap a day, half a pound per person a day, 365 days a year. Nearly all of that can and should be turned into compost. Across America and around the world more and more communities are ending the disposal of food scrap and beginning its reuse.

When food scrap is buried in a landfill anaerobic bacteria, bacteria that live in places with very little oxygen, break down the food scrap.  In situations where oxygen is abundant a very different set of bacteria break down the food scrap.  When food scrap is digested by bacteria without oxygen the emissions include large quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide.  In addition a variety of sulfur compounds are created in the decay process,   These stink, and are responsible for some, but not all,  of the odor issues at the Central Landfill.  RI Resource Recovery Corporation currently uses a methane recovery system in the landfill, selling the methane to an electric power plant, but the overall efficiency of methane capture is estimated at 50%. An alternative to burying the food scrap and recovering the methane is the building of large scale anaerobic digesters to create and capture methane.  These systems are much more efficient than burying and recapturing, dramatically reduce methane emissions and allow the residue to be used for fertilizer or feedstock  for aerobic composting.

 
If all of the food scrap was composted or digested under much more controlled conditions, including much of the leaf and yard waste of the Ocean State in the mix, the odor issues would be much reduced and methane emissions nearly eliminated. A huge resource formerly thrown away, would be providing Rhode Island jobs, possibly some green energy, and boost local soil fertility.
After exploring the compost industry in Rhode island for five years I can say people are much more knowledgeable, and that there is much more composting going on than five years ago. Further many people want to further develop the commercial potential of composting and digesting food scrap.
A big obstacle holding back the Ocean State compared to many other places is the very low price of disposal at the Central Landfill. We should note that in one of the few sectors where it appears that Rhode Island has a cost advantage of our neighbors and some of our competitors — the cost of trash disposal — we have a situation in which the low cost increases pollution and causes us to squander a resource that could very much help us overcome poverty and food insecurity. There is a larger lesson in there about economic development but I will leave that for another day.
The tale of how Rhode Island came to have such a low price that it impedes commerce and contributes to food insecurity is just the usual inside baseball and cost-shifting we see so often, but one that we are hoping the legislature will tackle soon. It will take action by the legislature to readjust the economics enough to kick open the door for the compost industry.
The Compost Initiative of the Environment Council of Rhode Island, as a partner with the Rhode Island Food Policy Council, the Resource Recovery Corporation, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and others have more recently been tackling some of the regulatory issues start ups in the industry face. We hope that while maintaining strict environmental and community standards — in other words the neighbors will not have to deal with odor or runoff from the facilities — it should be possible for community-garden-sized operations to develop without having to hire engineers and submit plans. In addition we hope very small commercial operations will have reduced filing fees as long as they demonstrate a clear knowledge of proper composting and have no adverse impact on their neighbors.
Every year Rhode Island has moved closer to a fully developed system to safely recycle the nutrients in food scrap., Maybe this is the year of the breakthrough.

Response to Jeffrey Sachs

Mr Sachs still seems to believe in the growth fairy. Developing world economies are going to grow for a while longer, but in the west, fast growth is over, and there is no real growth, just more funny money in the hands of the 1%.

Our crisis is not just ecological. It is also one of inequality. Evidence is very clear, inequality torpedoes economies as well as ecological collapse. We are in a crisis that only more democracy can heal. We can use less and share more only if the power of the 1% is checked by the community. We can not have industries blackmail a community with the old song and dance you shall have jobs if we can poison you. Communities must always have the right to say no to inappropriate development and yes to community investment.

Human beings already use way too much of the earth’s productivity to keep ecosystems healthy, we are living off the capital, not the yearly productivity of the earth. When the primary forests are completely gone, when the rural people have all been displaced, growth will be gone for everyone, not just those in the west where growth has already disappeared.

I ponder all the time whether there is a physical solution, or if changes in human consciousness about our place in the universe must come first. All I do know is that we must not do smart growth, but smart shrinkage in my neighborhood if we want to end hunger.

Response to Scott Mackay’s commentary

This morning I was listening to the radio and heard a commentary on the RI economy by Scott Mackay.  Mackay was spouting the usual propaganda offered to us by the ruling class.  We have to cut taxes and get folks working again.  Excuse me, but we have heard this before and it still does not work.

The conventional wisdom, the dominant paradigm,, the only ideas acceptable in the public square or in the commercial media are that if we could only make the world safer for the 1% we could have good times (fast economic growth) in Rhode Island and that the biggest problem that RI has is that it does not kow tow to the 1% enough because the unions will not let the corparados screw the workers.  Scott, I expect better of you, some real analysis and some real inquiry into the causes of our economic situation.

We need to ask a few new questions and have a different discussion this year.  Since we are already talking about the 1% and the 99%, we could talk about how the 99% have done under the corporate reign that began with Reagan in the 1980′s versus how the 1% has done.  There is NOTHING in the actions of workers since that time that in any way compares to the harm done to the American economy that the 1% has caused simply through rigging the system so that they get all the new wealth and everyone else gets poorer.   That is prosperity?

Would you at least ask the question about the role increasing inequality plays in messing up economies?  More and more authors are pointing out how inequality in the economy drives the growth out. Have you read any of that material?  They make a pretty convincing case that only when there is actual community participation in decisions on the economy can you achieve a sustainable prosperity in the age of climate change.

Have you tried to apply this new understanding of the role of inequality in gumming  up an economy to the standard wisdom being spouted in Rhode Island for the umpteeth time?  Have you asked how any of the proposals from the chamber of commerce, the various foundations and commissions, from the RIEDC or legislature will decrease inequality?  Or is it because no one wants to know the real answer, the one that says all of the ruling class ideas on how to fix the economy are based on a planet that no longer exists, in which true democracy is just an obstacle to prosperity.  Which Congress have you been watching for just how crazed the 1% and their lap dogs are?

Some more basic truths need to be applied to the conventional wisdom in RI.  The conventional wisdom says decrease regulations (I talked of taxes indirectly  in the previous paragraphs and will not repeat that case here).  but this morning, very close in time to your commentary there was a discussion of just how bad the air pollution in China is right now.  It is a true killer smog.  Just like places in the US got 50 years ago that caused us to try to get out of the stone age of regulations in which the rich could do anything and won every court case.  We made great progress, with cleaner technologies almost always providing for more efficient industrial processes and better profits, but to this day the loonies on the right demand less regulation and more right to pollute, destroy wetlands, over fish, and destroy the climate.  That gives us a country like China in which a small elite make the rules, they apply them selectively, and while the resistance to the rich grows every larger, the growth that the leaders crave gets eaten up  fixing the problems the over development is causing.  China may be eating up to 50% of its growth dealing with the damage each year.  Is your goal to return RI to that condition in pursuit of growth?

The road to prosperity does not pass through lower corporate taxes and deregulation, as much as I, like everyone in Rhode Island knows of rules and laws that just plain are hard to navigate and make life a bit crazy for innovators.  The road to prosperity begins with understanding that economic growth is essentially over in the west.  It is more than likely that wages in the west will start to settle down towards the global mean while incomes in the poorest parts of the world continue to rise, a bit.  We now have jobless recoveries in between bubbles.  Workers are obsolete, even college educated young people can not find jobs and are likely to be only loosely attached to the conventional job market for many years to come.

If we have jobless, bubble growth, is it actually growth?  But this is the only thing offered to us by the conventional wisdom.  So let us start to try to figure out how to create jobs even as the economy shrinks.  Two related places to start, ecological healing and food security. Which are completely integrated into the work to slow and adapt to climate change.

in other words building community resilience, growing more food, using less energy, recycling everything, is not to be the fringe or frill on the economy, it is the main course.  If Rhode Island wants prosperous communities, the only smart thing is to begin the process of ecological healing, restoring forests, soils, fisheries, watersheds, and clean transportation infrastructure.

The conventional wisdom will not get us there.  The conventional wisdom calls for austerity, deregulation, lower taxes on the rich.  Can someone tell me how that slows climate change and helps us adapt?  Can someone tell me how that does not lead to ever faster destruction of the ecosystems that feed us?   Can someone tell me how it reduces inequality in the community and allows communities to protect themselves from corporate greed and power?

Scott, I am waiting for a better analysis, one that actually asks the important questions rather than parroting the received wisdom. .

 

 

 

The ecology/economy interface in 2013

Greg Gerritt  1/1/13

Had a very interesting morning, reading about the next economy and walking in the woods along the Seekonk.

The reading was a mixed bag.  Some articles in the book “The Coming Transformation” edited by Kellart and Speth, an editorial in the Projo based on its long  series of articles on the economy (continuing its prescription that will not fly), and my weekly dose of ecoRI news, with reports on the Green economy and smart growth.

The trip to the river was excellent.  The mix of sun and clouds as the sun rose in the east, an eagle and a set of coyote tracks going along the same trail I was using.  In the three days since the snow the lone coyote track was the only thing on that trail.  It occurred to me that it might be nice for someone else to see the coyote trail so I tried not to step on it, but it was difficult. The trail, which I know quite well, is relatively broad, but it only has one good track for traveling the side hill.  The coyote was in that one track, so if I wanted to avoid the footprints, I had to walk off the real track, and it was clearly noticeable, I was just a bit off balance the whole time.

The eagle needs comment only because this year you see one nearly every day along the Seekonk, whereas when I moved to town 16 years ago I did not see any in this spot for several years.  Over the last 15 years they have become more and more common along the Seekonk, with at least 3 seen regularly this winter.

Getting back to following the trail, the coyote and I both followed a trail that was shaped by the contours of the hill (as modified by the trail maker).  The economic trail the Projo offers us ignores the contours of the land, offering us a vision of what the 1% would have us do to enrich them.  The environment, poverty, people, irrelevant.  We shall replace the people of RI with some mythological ready for business automatons that shall lets us pollute and steal to our hearts content.  They never explain how this benefits anyone other than the 1%.  They have been saying the same thing for at least 50 years, low taxes, bust unions and all will be right with the world.  If it worked so good, everyone would have been there years ago. There is no vast left wing conspiracy in the US with enough power to undermine the capitalists if they had anything of value to offer.  The Projo needs to understand that only economies with economic equality as a goal and practice can go forward successfully in the 21st Century.  As long as we try to enrich the rich, the RI economy is going to stay dormant.

Strike two for the Projo, and for all of the other commentators I read, is the continued expectation of economic growth.  If all the growth is pumped up funny money based on treating workers like dirt, financial shenanigans like looting pension funds and tax breaks for the rich, and the destruction of the global forest, can it really be called growth if more and more Rhode Islanders struggle to make ends meet? And the planetary systems are more and more damaged and less and less productive. 93% of the growth in income in the US over the last 5 years has gone to 1% of the population.  Do the math, If the second through the 10th percentiles did just a little better over that time, the other 90% actually lost income.  The economy being offered by the Projo, and the smart growth advocates is guaranteed to fail the community and the planet.  The fiscal cliff is just the latest farce in this tragedy.  There has to be a better way, and there is.

My goal for 2013 is to make sure that in Rhode Island the economic alternative to the global capitalist order that is eating the planet and poisoning the poor gets noticed and becomes more integrated into how we think about the economy and what we do to improve it.  Towards that end there will a conference on October 12 2013 Ecological Healing, Ecological Economics, Economic Justice:  Creating prosperity for the 99% in Rhode Island.  You should all put that in your calendar and make plans to attend.

 

 

Day length

As I get older I am becoming more familiar with the rhythms of the Solar System, the Earth around the sun, the moon around the earth and sun, and the other visible planets.  I am no expert, but have learned to find the plane of the ecliptic and more readily find planets.  I have learned to tell time by moon as well as the sun.

The last few years I have been frequently checking on both day length and the amount of daily change in day length.  One of the more interesting ways to ponder this is to note that every spot on earth gets exactly the same number of hours that the sun is above the horizon over the course of the year.  Every place on earth averages a 12 hour day, if you measured from sunrise to sunset and added them all up over the year.  At the North and South Poles there is 6 months of day and 6 months of night.  At the equator every day is 12 hours from sunrise to sunset.  It then follows that at 45 degrees north and south the longest day would be 16 hours and the shortest 8, give or take a few seconds as the world is not a perfect sphere.

Providence is at approximately 41 degrees North and has a shortest day length of 9 hours and 8 minutes and a longest day length of 14 hours and 52 minutes.  At the solstices day length changes by less then a second, 3 seconds the day before and after, 5 seconds the day before or after that, rising to 2 minutes and 48 seconds at the equinox and the days surrounding it.  For comparison I looked at the change in day length in Barrow Alaska in northern Alaska, and at the equinox day length was changing by 6 minutes and 47 seconds each day.

Makes sense as if day length is going to go from 1 hour to 23 hours in the same amount of time as day length in Providence goes from 9 hours to 15  the change each day is going to be much larger at the equinoxes than it is here, remembering that at the solstices everybody has a length change of zero.

One great thing about this is you only have to learn the numbers once.  They never change.  Next year, 15 years from now, 15000 years ago, day length at the winter solstice in Providence or what was the land upon which Providence was later planted was and will continue to be 9 hours and 8 minutes.  There are things that can change our relationship to the sun, but other than putting a motor on the planet and rocketing it to another part of the solar system, none of them can be changed by people.

I wish the same could be said about the climate. But clearly what we people have done is set the world on fire.  It is not going to be pretty, but there is much we can do to ameliorate the situation if we decide to.  I hope that learning about the sun, the planets, the moon, the tides, and closer to home the living world, will help us think more clearly about climate and what would be good courses of action.  I hope learning to look at the world, to observe, to measure, to analyze, but also to dream and imagine based on what we see will help us be more prepared for the coming storm.

Today the day length in Providence is 9 hours and 8 minutes, but tomorrow it will be 9 hours and 9 minutes, and it will be more than 20 seconds longer than the day before.  Summer is coming.

 

Take away points December 2012

I am preparing to give a short briefing to the staff of a public official.  Here is what i intend to talk about and to leave behind for sharing with their boss.

2 major topics  the economy and solid waste/compost

The economy:

The framing of the economy in the debate about how to create prosperity in our communities is one of the biggest obstacles to prosperity in RI.  As long as the debate is about how best to kowtow to the 1%,  the 1% will make out like bandits, while the rest of us, and the public infrastructure and our democracy, wither on the vine.

The evidence is becoming quite noticeable that economies that are more unequal work very poorly and inefficiently.  Everything we do to kow tow to the 1%, tax breaks, subsidies, tax policies, trade policies, military adventurism, hurts our communities.  Low taxes for the rich serves no good public purpose.

We have to think very carefully about the conditions for growth in modern economies.  Rhode Island does not meet any of those characteristics.  efforts to create faster growth therefore backfire, creating more inequality and slowing growth.  There is no room here to explain, but I would be happy to either by directing you to other writings or specifically setting up a time to talk about that.

Rhode Island will only get to a more equal economy if we practice economic democracy.  Communities have a right to determine what is not appropriate for our communities.  We give this option to towns about casinos, but not really much else.  We end up getting poisoned and with less prosperity.

38 Studios was a failure to practice democracy.  Compare and contrast to the stakeholder process on the Quonset container port.  The entire leadership of the state was on board screaming this is nirvana.   The public hearings demonstrated exactly how not true that was, and we made it obvious that the 2 con men had conned everyone except the public.  Based on conversations I had with some prominent RI business people and thinkers, public hearings would have exposed how bad a deal 38 Studios was.

In addition to the requirement of economic justice, prosperity in RI will not come about without ecological healing.  Not just in one area, but in many including climate, oceans, fisheries, biodiversity, soils, agriculture, and forests and retreating from the coastline.  Dismantling environmental protections or making it easier for businesses to do the wrong thing harms the economy, not helps it.  Claiming environmental regulations hurt business is old hat, and totally not true.

Solid Waste and Compost

RI should seek to become a zero waste state.  This will enable us to capture much more value out of the resources we already use.  And create more jobs while reducing our carbon footprint. If you are creating commissions to look at trash issues, a comprehensive approach is going to give us much more value for our efforts.

A big part of zero waste is compost.  We have to get the food scrap out of the waste stream so it can be used to grow more food.  Climate change and other factors are going to create a much less food secure RI unless we grow a lot more food here. And that does not happen without compost from food scrap.

RI needs to raise tip fees.  As long as it is dirt cheap to throw stuff in the dump, our communities will demand to do just that.  We can not raise tip fees without a comprehensive approach that creates clear community benefits.

 

 

The real pension fund dilemma in Rhode Island

Today on the news I heard that RI state pension funds had a return on investment of 1.5% in the last fiscal year.  Grew right along with the growth of the economy for the 1%.  Rest of us fell further behind.   But what the pension fund really fell behind on was its expected growth, the growth that allows the fund to make payments to retirees. The official expectation for the pension fund is growth of 7.5% each year.  This is recent as previously the rate of return expected had been close to 8%.  In either case the actual return was only 1/5 of the expected return.  Adding to a long string of years in which growth targets were missed by a wide margin.

In a place without an out of control ruling class seeking new ways to loot the populace, the state would tax the wealthy to make up the difference in the pension funds because there is a clear understanding that equalizing the wealth strengthens the economy.

But even that will not really solve the problem that the pension funds are going to get smaller and smaller returns over time.  Not due to mismanagement, but because the economy is going to get smaller.  The stringing out of the recovery after the bubble burst being only the latest and most abundant clue that we have essentially reached the end of economic growth in the west, especially any growth that actually flows into the hands of the 99%.  There are many levers that can be pushed to create more economic growth, but the one thing economic growth is unable to survive is ecological collapse.  The loss of soils, clean water, forests, fisheries, and biodiversity, combined with the fires, droughts, floods, and heat waves of climate change is eating up all the actual growth and many people are ending up poorer even if a few in the cities are getting richer.

This is why over the last 15 years the west has either been in the midst of some bubble or in recession. We have gone from HI Tech and internet, to Housing and strange financial instruments as the bubble we obsess over, but the results are the same.  A small class makes out, everyone else falls behind, and the Earth becomes a less hospitable place with diminished life.

Rhode Island’s pension fund is hurting even with the current “fix” and the economic shenanigans used to grow the economy faster are a disaster (remember 38 Studios).  Rhode Island needs a new course, based on ecological healing and economic justice if it is going to have prosperity.

Potomac Fever

The President and the Congress suffer from an extremely virulent form of Potomac Fever.  It seems to strike many who go to Washington to hold power.  Unfortunately Potomac Fever is a disease that only kills those who do not have it.  The uninfected it kills by the millions, while the biggest bubble on earth insulates the Washington elite from dying of the Potomac Fever they rain down on the rest of us.

Austerity does not work

Rhode island voters normally approve bond issues for infrastructure, schools, and protecting the environment (broadly defined).  2012 was no exception.  The legislature had to be dragged kicking and screaming to put the bond issues on the ballot, the people approved them overwhelmingly.

There are many reasons for the people being ahead of the legislature on this.  The primary reason is that most of us never have our ears twisted by millionaires promising re-election if they just cut services more and lower taxes.  Out here where most of us live it becomes more obvious daily that good public services, good schools and well thought out transportation systems for example as well as robust emergency systems, make a huge difference in the health and prosperity of the community, and we have seen little evidence that privatizing all services will save us money or improve service.  All it will do is undercut the middle class.  We have also figured out that the health of the ecosystem and the natural and agricultural areas around us makes a huge difference in our lives, and the prosperity of our communities.

So the people voted quite strongly for better infrastructure and a healthier environment, for investing in the future.  Hopefully the legislature has learned a bit, and figures out the next budget crunch needs to be balanced on the backs of the wealthy not on the rest of us.

Further buttressing the argument is the recent work noting that economies with less economic inequality work better.  Demand and supply are more predictable, and much less money is hoarded.  Money stays circulating in the community longer as well.

Come to the conference on October 12 2013 Ecological Healing, Environmental Justice, and Prosperity for RI communities.  Registration will open soon.

 

 

 

reacting to comments on the election

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are prepared for the changes that climate change is bringing. They are unprepared for shrinking the military, making healthcare truly affordable and based on prevention, and building resilience and self reliance in our communities as the road to prosperity. Both parties set us up for a failed economy because they think growth is essential, while the planet tells us that smaller and more equal is going to work better

The 16th Annual Buy Nothing Day Winter Coat Exchange

Friday November 23, 2012

If you have a coat to give, please drop it off.
 If you need a coat, please pick one up.
 

 

Rhode Island sites and their specific activities and times

 

Providence  State House Lawn  brick patio across from the mall

Collection and give away   November 23 10 AM to 2 PM

Rain location  Gloria Dei Lutheran Church  15 Hayes Street  Providence

Contacts Greg Gerritt: 331-0529; gerritt@mindspring.com;

Phil Edmonds: 461-3683; philwhistle@gmail.com


Pawtucket –  175 Main St   Blackstone Valley Visitors Center

Coats accepted at the visitors center and many other locations in Pawtucket  all through November during business hours.

Collection at November Winters Farmers Markets Wednesday evening and Saturday morning at Hope Artiste Village

Coats given away Friday  Nov. 23  10AM  -2PM

Contact  Arthur Pitt 724-8915; kingarthur02940@yahoo.com   http://www.neighborhoodlink.com/NAP-_Neighborhood_Alliance_of_Pawtucket/home

Newport – St Paul’s Church United Methodist Church

12 West Marlborough St.

Coats collected and given away Friday November 23 10 AM to Noon  Coats Collected Sunday mornings  in November at the church.

Contact Maggie Bulmer 849-3537.

Wakefield St. Francis Church, 114 High Street,
Coats collected and given away 10AM to Noon

Contact Tom Abbott 364-0778

East Providence  Breed Hall  610 Waterman Ave

(EP Senior Center Complex)  Coats collected and given away Friday November 23  9 Am to 1 PM  Coats collected throughout November at various locations in East Providence and Seekonk including the Newman YMCA.

Contact  David or Lisa Spencer  401-965-9099    Dspencer@atlanticpaper.com

 

 

Bristol Elks Lodge  1 Constitution St

Coats Collected throughout November  Coats given away Friday November 23  10 AM – 2 PM

Contact Connie Ganley  mcganley@comcast.net  508-837-0467

 

YMCA of Greater Providence

2012 Winter Coat Exchange Drop-Off/Pick-Up Sites

 

Drop-Off Collection    November 1 – 22

Pick Up     November 23              10:00 a.m. – 2 p.m.

 

 

Cranston YMCA                    Kent County YMCA

1225 Park Avenue           900 Centerville Road

Cranston, RI 02910        Warwick RI 02886

401-943-0444                 401-828-0130

 

West Bay Family YMCA

7540 Post Road

North Kingstown RI 02852

401-295-6501

 

Drop Off coats at the Y November 1 – 22 to be distributed at other sites on November 23

 

East Side/Mt Hope YMCA                   YMCA of Greater Providence Association Office              Providence Youth Services

438 Hope Street                                  371 Pine Street

Providence, RI 02906                            Providence, RI 02903

401-521-0155                                     401-456-0604

 

Drop off locations, with coats distributed at other Coat Exchange sites

Newman YMCA                                South County YMCA

472 Taunton Avenue                             165 Broad Rock Road

Seekonk, MA 02771                               Peacedale RI

508-336-7103                                        401-783-3900

 

 

 

Questions for candidates answered

There is good evidence that the US economy is coming to the end of growth.  For most Americans incomes have been dropping for 30 years, and all the recent growth periods were simply economic bubbles, with housing being the final one that tipped the applecart big time.  But we still need prosperous communities.  What is your plan for full employment in Rhode Island as the size of the monetary economy diminishes, and how will you keep a full suite of governmental services, something more critical for managing such dangerous transitions?

There are probably no good political answers for this, especially given the American predilection to only elect people who tell us good news.  We are among the most good times craving people in the world, and therefore very prone to a swinging gate in politics, with neither party able to effectively govern when things go wrong.  Our parties are poor at middle ground, but even weaker at realizing something other than the deficit has gone over the edge.

Manifest Destiny continues to define our approach to economics, and especially our view of the ecology/economy interface.  While we have many conservationists there is continuing pressure to allow more and more resources to be used up faster and faster on the grounds that it produces a few jobs, but mostly because it makes a few fortunes.   Everything is about outsourcing  because those with fortunes no longer want to pay decent wages, so if it is not outsourced to a low wage high pollution place, the workers have been outsourced by machines.

The first thing to understand is that given the state of the world wages in the US will continue to come down, moving towards the global mean.  The speed at which the wages sink is directly correlated with the state of  inequality in America.  If the rules continue to be skewed so that 1% of the population receives 93% of the new wealth, wages will drop very fast.  If we adopt a strong policy of use less, share more, un-American in every way, but critical in the age of climate change and extinctions,  the economy lands much better for most of us.

Another part of use less, share more is interest rates, and the use of credit.  Clearly capitalism could not have evolved without the  extensive use of credit.  It is a major change from what came before, in that it demands a constantly growing economy in order for debts to be repaid.  The immediate result, often the first result since forests and wood products are the building block (literally) of all civilizations, (because of wood’s versatility and properties, and because it can be appropriated as a free good by killing and displacing the the people who live in it) Is to cut down all of the forest.  To this day everywhere economies are seeking to grow swiftly forest people are being displaced to cemeteries if they resist, or shanty towns and slums if they do not.   Cultures often crash after the forest is gone because they lose their soil and water.

Given this incredible reliance on forests (try imagining your community without wood products or the flood control that forests do) One would think that the first rule of keeping communities healthy would be do not cut the forest faster than it grows.  This would mean that loans for businesses that work in the wood and wood using industries can not be expected to pay more than about 2% interest if they are to leave healthier forests than they found via management and wood removals.  In other words a 2% return on investment is all that is proper in places like New England given that in a very good year a New England forest will increase in woody biomass by about 3% and our depleted forests need rebuilding

Fisheries and other animal based systems can stand higher harvest rates, but soils and  substrates build even slower than forest biomass, turning farming and fishing into soil and ocean bottom mining rather than sustainable activities if they are harvesting too much.  Farming must become about building soil if it is to feed 9 billion of us each year.  That says 2% loans, 2% return on investment is all that can be produced while healing the ecosystems.

Another factor to consider is that using fossil fuels to work the land constantly displaces people while contributing to greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the food supply and forest health.  I often say, only a bit in jest, that there is enough oil on the planet to destroy all of the forest.   People can work the land much more lightly than machines, and are able to build soil much more effectively without large machines.  Or cut more selectively or fish less intensively.  A factory trawler tries to catch everything.  Catching with rod reel or similar technologies leaves fish behind to breed.  And takes more people rather than investments in technology.

Which gets us back to how are we going to create more jobs as the economy shrinks.  We are going to have more farmers, fishers, and forest workers using less technology and paying a lot more attention to the health of the ecosystem they are working in.

Yes, I am aware of the idea that working the land will never pay the wages that a modern economy pays, but the reality is that planet Earth can not pay them either, so we have an plan that fits the reality of a diminished capacity on planet earth.

As to how we maintain government services under such dire circumstances, we need to figure out what our communities really need.  And the first thing we do NOT need is the war machine.  Start by reducing military spending by 10% each year.  Take half of that and spend it on education for people of all ages,  research, development and implementation of clean energy and working the land and oceans properly, and rebuilding infrastructure for the 21st century.  This then allows us to massively shrink the prison industrial complex, again diverting the money to maternal and child health, good food for all, and healthy housing.  Finally, tax the rich, tax speculative investments, tax carbon emissions, and take sufficient royalties for the community for the use of the commons and for patenting things developed from living things to support critical services including preparing our lowest income communities for climate change by building up their resilience.

 

What role does economic inequality play in the overall health of the economy?

Evidence is pouring in that the more inequality in an economy the less well it functions.  Too many stick points for markets to work efficiently, too poor a distribution of resources, which creates a need for additional services, either health and education or police and prisons.  With a higher percentage of our population in poverty, prison, and ill than almost any other industrialized nation, clearly we have chosen poorly by increasing inequality.  Often writers on the topic such as Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz think that if we can reduce inequality we can get the economy growing again.  I disagree, the economy is not going to grow, but clearly reducing inequality will make the economy function much better.

 

All politicians know a bit of math, and if I said to you that a community was spending 135% of its income each year, you would likely be looking at a community with a massive debt problem.   Now consider the Earth.  People are using 135% of the biological productivity of the planet each year.  And just as towns, families, businesses hemorrhage money if expenses are 135% of income, the Earth is losing forests, soils, fisheries, wildlife, clean water at a rate that is only partially covered up by the vastness of the Earth, and shows up every day in the lives of people with less to eat and the loss of the resource base that feeds them and their families.    It is likely that we shall be unable to maintain community prosperity if the resource base is too degraded, so what is your plan to return the health of the ecosystem, in other words reduce the amount people are using until it is below the carrying capacity and the systems can be rebuilt, and how does it fit in with your plan to balance the budget, since ecological disasters will overwhelm any budget you create that harms ecosystems and does not account for the need to heal them in your fiscal expenditures.


While politicians are apoplectic about the budget deficit, they seem almost completely undeterred by the ecological deficit our economy is running.  Unfortunately ecological deficits are more likely to cause collapse than budget deficits.  Politicians have gotten so used to be bailed out and supported by the huge storehouse of planet Earth that they forget how much conditions have changed in the last 65 years.    Population has tripled and the amount of stuff used per person has increased even more,so our ecological footprint has skyrocketed beyond all reason or ability of the Earth to stay healthy.

Politicians always assume a growing economy will help them balance the budget, but in our case the more we try to grow, the further behind we fall.  Therefore the only things that will balance the budget are spending less on things that harm us and taxing the things that harm us and the rich at higher rates.  Prime places to reduce spending include the police/prison industrial complex, payments to insurance companies (which can be replaced by a less expensive health care system based on prevention)  and subsidies to industries that increase inequality in the economy.  Taxes on the income of the wealthy, capital gains, and speculation should all be increased. Taxes on carbon should be implemented,

An essay on the spirit of Buy Nothing Day 2012

Every year  write an essay on the spirit of the Buy Nothing Day Winter Coat Exchange and how to heal the economy, ecosystem, and communities of Rhode Island using the principles of use less, share more.  Often I dedicate the essay to those trying to end poverty, war, or planetary destruction, or in jest dedicate it to those making things much worse in the community.  Last year I dedicated the essay to Occupy Providence and their brethren around the world challenging the power of Wall ST.  i was going to dedicate this year’s essay to Curt Schilling, 38 Studios, and their enablers in Rhode Island for squandering $100 million of our money on violent video games, but today as I was preparing to write I saw an article on how the Rhode Island Foundation was going to put $1 million into a fund that would be used to help grow the Rhode Island economy.  http://prosperityforri.com/38-studios-and-economic-development-in-rhode-island-2/  is an essay I wrote this past summer which tells you how much I think a growth fund will work, which is essentially not at all.
People are already using 135% of the biological productivity of the planet each year, which means that every year the global forest disappears, fisheries are diminished, and our soil washes to the bottom of the sea, carrying its nitrogen fertilizer load and thereby creating huge dead zones in the ocean. We need to get well below 100% if life on earth is to continue.  And if you look at the American economy the only thing that passes for growth are the economic bubbles  and the pumped up funny money that the 1% pay themselves.  Over the last 30 years 93% of all growth in income in the US has gone to 1% of the population.  Everyone except the 1% and the next few percents behind them has gotten poorer.  Economic Growth no longer is real and every time I turn around I see another article about why it is no longer a useful concept.
The Rhode Island Foundation therefore joins a long line of rogues in suggesting that we ought to grow our way out of our misery.  Whether by another tax cut for the millionaires, a call to drill baby drill, more wars for oil, or the growth fund of the Rhode Island Foundation, the thrashing around in the name of growth benefits the 1% and kills the rest of us and the planet.  Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz recently pointed out how poorly economies do as they become more unequal.  Robert Gordon of the National Bureau of Economic Research recently published a paper on the end of growth, with rising inequality being one of the bigger factors leading to the demise of growth.  Yesterday I received an article from the New Economics Foundation on how economic growth has no role in alleviating poverty, it just makes inequality worse.
If the Rhode Island Foundation wanted to do something useful for the RI economy it would call for an end to tax breaks for the rich, which do nothing but make the economy more unequal. Then   stop the bubble economies, reregulate the banks and investment markets, and do more to protect and heal ecosystems.  The Rhode island Foundation does many wonderful things, supports many worthy causes, but it continues to view the world through the lens of the 1% and therefore is sort of clueless about what economic growth really means on this finite planet and what the thrashing around in search of ever more growth does to our communities.
Given the state of the world, and the state of Rhode Island, on November 23 I will be out on the State House Lawn collecting and distributing winter coats. The generosity of Rhode Islanders will salve my soul, while the poverty we see among those lined up to get coats will drive me to work harder to alleviate the twin ills of poverty and ecological collapse.  Volunteer or donate to the 16th Annual Buy Nothing Day Winter Coat Exchange.  There will be more sites around the state than ever before with the Greater Providence YMCA opening their facilities to the collection and distribution of winter coats in November.  We can not solve the problems of the world in a day, especially if we do not address the root causes.  But using less and sharing more on November 23 is a good thing to do along the road to a better Rhode island.   Hope to see you.

Jill Stein for president

Neither of the candidates of the two largest political parties in the US, nor the largest parties in general, have anything to offer us on how to solve and salve the ills  of our time.  The only thing they can do any longer is debate how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.  There is nothing in economics these days that seriously suggests that tax breaks for the wealthy will do anything to improve the economy of the United States, nor any reasonable doctrine that says killing more people in Asia with drones will make us safer or contributes to a better energy policy.
To me only one candidate for president actually grasps the nature of the catastrophe that has befallen the people of the US, a catastrophe brought about by the rich and powerful driving America into the ground.  Only Green Party candidate Jill Stein among presidential candidates, with her Green New Deal, offers the rebuilding of our communities and the shrinking of our military, especially a withdrawal from violent foreign entanglements, as a path forward.  Putting mitigating and reversing global warming as a priority of her administration, as well as having the wealthiest Americans carry more weight for fixing the problems they have caused, including the housing crisis, the Stein plan naturally leads to economic changes that put resources in the hands of our communities with local production for local needs, rather than maintaining military might to prevent Asians from managing their own resources.  Anyone pretending that the deficit can be reduced without taxing the rich more and closing the vast majority of US military bases over seas is deluding themselves.  Jill  gets it.
So get out and vote for a candidate who really stands for the way the 99% want to solve the problems.  Vote Jill Stein, Green Party Candidate for Presiden

western civilization

A response to an article by Calebo Jacob

 

I am less and less enamored with the idea that western civilization has something special to offer humanity.  I support reading great literature, have read a good sprinkling of it, but the perspective of the civilization that has driven the global ecosystem off the cliff with its greed and demand for more does not uniquely hold wisdom that automatically is useful to salvaging the cascading disasters on planet earth.  Many other cultures hold wisdom that the west ought to learn from equally.  Western imperialism is a fact on the ground, but that does not make it a good thing for the mind.

Questions for candidates

I came up with the first question for the SNA candidates forum.

There is good evidence that the US economy is coming to the end of growth.  For most Americans incomes have been dropping for 30 years, and all the growth periods were simply economic bubbles, with housing being the final one that tipped the applecart big time.  But we still need prosperous communities.  What is your plan for full employment in Rhode Island as the size of the monetary economy diminishes, and how will you keep a full suite of governmental services, something more critical for managing such dangerous transitions?

 

Then when i started to post here I realized it would be fund to think of a few more.  So here goes.

 

What role does economic inequality play in the overall health of the economy?

 

All politicians know a bit of math, and if I said to you that a community was spending 135% of its income each year, you would likely be looking at a community with a massive debt problem.   Now consider the Earth.  People are using 135% of the biological productivity of the planet each year.  And just as towns, families, businesses hemorrhage money if expenses are 135% of income, the Earth is losing forests, soils, fisheries, wildlife, clean water at a rate that is only partially covered by the vastness of the Earth, and shows up every day in the lives of people with less to eat and the loss of the resource base that feeds them and their families.    It is likely that we shall be unable to maintain community prosperity if the resource base is too degraded, so what is your plan to return the health of the ecosystem, in other words reduce the amount people are using until it is below the carrying capacity and the systems can be rebuilt, and how does it fit in with your plan to balance the budget, since ecological disasters will overwhelm any budget you create that harms ecosystems and does not account for the need to heal them in your fiscal expenditures.

 

 

Press Release on the RIPEC report

ProsperityForRI.com
You can not end poverty without healing ecosystems, You can not heal ecosystems without ending poverty
Press release
Contact information
Greg Gerritt    401-331-0529      gerritt@mindspring.com
Press release;
ProsperityForRI.com states RIPEC report completely misses the boat.
Think Tank ProsperityForRI.com, an organization focused on creating sustainability for Rhode Island’s communities notes that the RIPEC report “Defining Government’s role in Economic Development in the Ocean State” suggests that the RIDEM be included in a Secretariat of Commerce, and that this is directly opposite of what is needed to return Rhode Island communities to prosperity.  Focusing on the needs of the 1% RIPEC continues to insist, as its corporate funders always push it to do, that a streamlining of Rhode Island to make it more business friendly is just what will bring RI to prosperity.  But as ProsperityForRI.com founder Greg Gerritt notes, “the economy has changed dramatically, and the only way forward is an economy that works well for the lowest income Rhode Islanders and the ecosystem.  The RIPEC report continues to insist on an economic development model that has failed for 50 years and will continue to fail as it does not account for ecosystem collapse or the need for greater equality in the economy.  Given ecosystem collapse it is not surprising that the most vibrant part of the Rhode Island economy today organic agriculture, which only the DEM among state agencies supports.  Hamstringing DEM is likely to have extremely adverse effects on Rhode Island.
Recent reports by Robert Gordon of Northwestern University and the National Bureau of Economic Research on the end of economic growth, and ProsperityForRI.com on a new approach to creating prosperity in the Ocean State note how important greater equality in the economy is for proper functioning and ecological healing.  The continued attempt by the 1% to dismantle environmental protections works against the health of the RI economy and against the prosperity of our communities.
The problem with economic development in RI is not so much the practioners, but that the goal is wrong.  As long as it is believed that making the rich happy  brings prosperity Rhode Island will continue to stumble.  Relying upon corporate funded groups such as RIPEC to chart the economic course for Rhode Island will continue to cause us to stumble.  For more information please check out http://prosperityforri.com/38-studios-and-economic-development-in-rhode-island-2/

More fish

Today at noon time the river was teeming with fish.  From north of Citizens Bank to north of Smith St.  not only huge schools of little menhaden, but the first schools I have seen of larger sized fish.  I did see the night heron catch a larger fish yesterday, and several of the menhaden had fresh cuts like the birds tried to catch them and they got away.

Moshassuck Wildlife today

Today I saw huge schools of menhaden by the Smith St and broken wooden bridges along
Canal St and the Great Blue Heron that has been hanging out between the bridges took a poop that crated a white circle in the water 18 inches in diameter.  Watcvhing it come out was amazing just one giant whoosh.

In the NBG I saw tadpoles in the4 big pond for the first time since late June.  i have been wondering where the new crop is, and saw a number of them today.  The murky water makes observation difficult this time of year, so it was interesting that today was the day to see them.

Menhaden in the Moshassuck September 2012

It’s mid September and the menhaden are back in the lower Moshassuck.  If the conditions are right, sun, rain, tide, temperature, then you can see thousands of small, 2 to 3 inch menhaden in schools in the river along Canal street.  The menhaden excursion to downtown in September is something I have been watching since I moved to Providence in 1996.

It varies every year. Including when it arrives.  This year is dominated by small fish.  Their big sisters are around as I saw them in the Seekonk River today making some very sizable splashes.  Several years ago the big ones came to downtown in huge numbers, estimated at 10,000 fish, and stayed for two months.  For years the only ones i saw very small ones, first year mostly,  But three times in the last 8 years large ones dominated.  And some years you hardly see a one. Hopefully the days of none are behind us.  The fish bring much to the urban core.

The places to see them are in the canal immediately north of the Citizens Bank building, going up Canal street.  Especially fruitful has been the pool immediately north of bridge spanning  the river at Park Row.  Several times this summer a 40 inch eel was seen in the pool, but at shallow water the menhaden stand out against the wall in the middle of the river.  Crabs are also a daily siting.

I wandered along the Woonasquatucket River this week as well and found an abundance of menhaden along the Promenade.  I am a bit jealous of my friends at the Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council their river is bigger and gets a lot more fish.  The herring runs of spring are even more of a sign of ecological healing in the Woonie despite the superfund site.

Maybe that makes the sitings in the mighty Mo’s estuary more of an enjoyment. They are harder to come by.

My favorite accompaniment to the menhaden run is found below the collapsing bridge below the Statehouse on Canal St.  The broken bridge holds up a large pile of woody and trashy debris, with its bones being trees that have floated down the river.  The pieces change, but the overall structure is pretty stable and survives floods.  The bridge may not survive many more big storms.  But until it washes out to sea the herons, Great Blue and Night will use it for refuge and hunting.  This morning i saw the Night Heron nab a little fish and swallow hard.  Yesterday it was a young Great Blue that I greeted on my way to the office.  Often the taxi drivers who wait at the taxi stand along the river on Canal and I converse about the birds and fish we see.  Sometimes we do not share a vocal language, but gestures work.

Thats the news from the lower Moshassuck.  I will be checking out the headwaters later in the week, and co leading a hike with The Nature Conservancy on September 22, so maybe a headwaters report will follow as well as updates if I see anything interesting at the North Burial Ground or along the tidewater.

 

 

 

38 Studios and Economic Development in Rhode island

38 Studios and Economic Development in Rhode Island   Greg Gerritt Aug 30, 2012
When i started writing this essay 38 Studios had just gone under.  I thought in a week or two of writing I could produce an essay about some of the lessons learned.  It turns out I needed to write a longer and more expansive piece on economic development and the future of the RI economy.  So, after several months of daily writing,  using 38 Studios as a place to start the conversation, I offer 4 things.  A very brief overview of the 38 Studios debacle,  a brief discussion of how economic development is practiced in Rhode Island and the United States, a discussion of a new economic development paradigm based on ecological healing, democracy, equality, and justice, and suggestions on how best to move forward in RI.

Read the rest at

http://prosperityforri.com/38-studios-and-economic-development-in-rhode-island/

or just click on 38 studios in the pages column to the right

 

A geography of my summer vacation

For 10 days in early August 2012 I vacationed in California.  My wife and I flew into Sacramento, in the Central Valley, drove to Fort Bragg on the Mendocino coast, spent several days exploring the coast and the coastal watersheds, drove east to the Sierra Nevada, spent several days at about 4500 feet elevation, and then returned to Sacramento before flying home.  This is a short description of what I saw.
I have now been in California’s Central Valley several times, and have seen much of what can be seen from I-5.  The Central Valley is a very dry valley hundreds of miles long, with rivers coming out of the Sierra Nevada mountains to the east and running to the sea.  What has not been turned into suburbs and strip malls is farmland.  All kinds of crops, with a vast system of agricultural canals carrying water from the mountains to keep it growing.  It is the heart of America’s agricultural system, growing more vegetables than any other state, and supplying the whole nation.  You can occasionally see from mountain range to mountain range, and in between it is all farmland.
Going west from the central valley as you enter the hills there are trees.  There are trees in wet spots in the Central Valley, but I a not familiar with what the vegetation was prior to the 49ers.  I am guessing some sort of sparse grass/shrub mix except where it was wet along the creeks and rivers, with dry country oaks, but who knows.  Today most of it is farm and suburb and it all runs on irrigation.
Going up into the hills is a mix of open terrain grassland and trees.  Much of it rangeland, with low carrying capacity.  It is very steep hills with narrow valleys.  The direction of a slope strongly influences what grows there, with the hottest, driest spots being more grass, and wetter spots, less evaporative spots, having more trees.  Higher up conifers mix in and then replace the oaks. As we continued towards the coast through the lakes region on route 20 it got wetter, and more forested.  After crossing 101 you are in the coast range and on the western slope, there are redwoods.
I did not go to any of the parks with big redwoods, spending much time walking the dirt roads and tracks in one little river valley, which was cleared, sort of farmed/ranched flats along a small river and a tributary stream, and low steep hills filled with second growth redwood.  I read a personal history of the valley by the father of the present owner of the ranch.  It was a logging camp when the camps relied upon railroads to transport men and materials in and out of the hills.  The area was logged from about 1910  to the early 1930s.  The valleys were cleared and farmed to provide food for those logging the hills.   The valley once grew many different kinds of crops, but now other than kitchen gardens the fields were growing grass for cows, horses, sheep, and goats.  Rough pasture to be sure. I did notice that they did not put orchards on the flats, but used the very lowest part of the steep hillsides for orchards, and near the house my relative lives in the hillside was covered with apple and plum trees.   Blackberries lined much of the road network, and were just becoming ripe the first week of August.  I found some very juicy berries, but many were still green.  Bears were in on the plums and leaving giant turds full of plum pits in the dirt roads during the night.  There were also a number of black tail deer in the area, mostly pretty tame as they were not hunted on the ranch or the adjacent ranch.  The ravens were very bold.
The particular valley i was in was not really being worked, it had sheep and horses in the pastures, but there was an agricultural renaissance going on all over the area with new farmers markets helping farmers get back to feeding the community.  A very different setting from Rhode Island, small isolated communities cut off by steep mountains.  But the surge towards ecologically healing activities as the way forward is strong.
I did climb one of the little hills once.  They are very hard climbing, steep and forested.  I found coming down more difficult as the subsoil seemed to come from broken up rock and it was easy to slide down the face kicking up sandstone remnants or something like that.  I heard that several folks around had paths up some of the hills that they used for various activities, but I never found any.
The other ecosystem explored on the coast of California was the coast line and its bluffs.  Close to the ocean one finds large areas of grass and shrub.  Often they end at 30 or 40 high bluffs falling down to beaches, and only rarely is there some easy path to the beach except at the mouth’s of rivers. .  The coastline is indented with many streams as the coast range gets quite a bit of rain over the course of the year, and it is pretty cool even in the summer.  Very hot days were those over 85. I can not describe the beaches other than as an amazing array of slopes, materials, and arrangements based on the erosive power of water in a gravity powered system.  The coastline is so spectacular, with cliffs so high, that I do not like being on Route 1 as I no longer do very well peering off the edge of cliffs as I ride by.  I do not ever remember running into so many osprey in California.  We saw them numerous places, and i do not remember them being so prevalent in previous trips. have been watching for them most of my life, so I am guessing that it may be the result of healthier ecosystems in CA.  Or at least fewer persistent pesticides in the water and fish. We also saw harbor seals, whales, and a variety of birds while standing on the cliffs.
After several days on the coast and in the little valley 2 miles from the ocean we drove east the entire width of California and went up into the Sierra Nevada, passing back through the Coast Range Forest and the Central Valley, then climbing the foothills into the mountains.  Coming up the hills into the Sierra Nevada the grasslands and shrubs give way to forests as you rise.  The roads primarily follow the rivers except where one must go over the divide. The switchbacks are almost as scary as the ones along the coast.  We stayed at a resort at about 4500 feet elevation in an area almost completely covered with Jeffrey’s pine, which produce very large pine cones.  The trees are widely spaced with sparse grass and sagebrush  in between.
The resort was about a mile from the Feather River which could be reached by walking down a dirt track.  A small river, it ran among the hills, swinging back and forth as the hills crowded in from one side and then the other.  The bluffs varied from 20 to about 100 feet high over looking the river, and rocks, granite, that had fallen from the hills filled the valley.  When the bluffs were a bit removed from the river course the river had a relatively gentle slope with vegetated wetlands making for treacherous walking.  Where the bluffs were close to the water boulders filled the channel, including several spots in which the entire river ran under boulders and you could walk on top of the river crossing back and forth as if on dry land.  It was a great place for a little easy climbing and playing on the boulders.  Among the boulders in less constricted spots there were pools that were great for swimming, with the water temperature perfect for cooling off on the 90 degree days.  Nights were much cooler. The pools contained several types of fish, an iridescent small green fish in schools seemed the most common, and followed the rule of the bigger the pool, the bigger the resident fish.  There were also dippers, frogs,  and tadpoles.  Walking to and from the river through the Jeffrey’s Pine forest the most common ground dwellers were little lizards.  In New England one does not run into lizards, but on previous trips to California I had seen many. Once I got a good look at something scurrying along I remembered, and then saw them frequently.  The ground squirrels were also pretty.
Returning to the 107 degree furnace of the Central Valley to fly out, I had an evening to explore an area near the Sacramento airport and basketball arena.  Farmland until recently, the area was under massive development pressure until the real estate bubble broke at the start of the Great Recession.  Now it is littered with half empty strip malls and office parks, concrete shells held up by rusting poles, and outdoor food malls with drive ways, wires, plumbing, and no buildings.  The Jackrabbits have reclaimed the abandoned areas with scores living among the detritus of the real estate bubble.  The scale of what was abandoned and never occupied in this area was astounding.  It was a clear statement on how far the Golden State has fallen, but it does not appear they have learned the lesson yet, They are just waiting for the next boom.

Rally for Jobs, Peace, and Planet

My apologies to those of you receiving this email who do not live in Rhode Island or nearby places.  You will miss out on one very cool rally.
This spring I spent much of my time watching tadpoles develop into Gray Tree Frogs in the little pond at the North Burial Ground.  I think next year I am going to have to make a video.  As tadpole season progressed Rhode Island was rocked by the collapse of 38 Studios, the video game business created by Curt Schilling.  That debacle is going to cost the taxpayers of RI $100 million.  It was all inside baseball with the governor personally working the system to get Schilling the money.  I started writing on the failure of economic development policy in Rhode Island from an ecological perspective in an essay that has taken on a life of its own.  It will be months before it is done.
In some ways the Rally for Jobs, Peace, and Planet combines my work on these two topics, ecology and sustainable economics,  with one of the other things that is close to my heart, Green Party presidential politics.  Some of you know that I had a major hand in developing the process by which Green Party presidential candidates are chosen.  This year the system really worked well, and we have a great candidate, Jill Stein.  In Rhode Island we are currently petitioning to get Jill on the ballot, it takes 1000 signatures signatures of registered Rhode Island voters, and to culminate that petition drive, get some votes in November, and really get out a message on these issues that is drowned in the issues free dog and pony show that is the current state of American Presidential Politics, a bunch of us are putting together a rally on August 18 called “A Rally for Jobs Peace, and Planet”.  Jill Stein will be the keynoter, but we are also lining up a great lineup of speakers, including me, and some fabulous entertainment including the Duopoly Jalopy.
The site for the rally will be the Roger Williams National Historic Site, a beautiful park in downtown Providence where Roger Williams found a fresh water spring that he used to provide drinking water for the first Europeans to live in Providence.  A community center based on clean water for the lively experiment in democracy that Williams fostered seems perfect for a Rally on Jobs, Peace, and Planet.
RALLY FOR JOBS, PEACE, AND PLANET
Saturday, August 18 @ 3pm
The Roger Williams National Memorial
282 North Main Street  (along the lower end of the Blackstone Canal and the Moshassuck River) 


I encourage all of you to attend, and i encourage all of you to help in other ways if you can.
To bring Jill’s message to the Ocean State, the Green Party of Rhode Island is paying for park services, sound systems, space rentals, and permits. We’re using public venues and our expenses are reasonable, but we do have to pay them, from our local Party budget. You can help! Please visit RIGREENS.ORG to make a secure donation, hosted at PayPal, in any amount you can.
You can also support the campaign of Jill Stein, and her vice presidential running mate Cheri Honkola where ever you are.  By going to the campaign website, http://www.jillstein.org/  you can donate, volunteer, and learn.
Look forward to seeing many of you on August 18, and hope you will support this rally and campaign efforts in other ways as well.
Greg Gerritt

Frogs

This week’s observations at the NBG.

 

The little pond is much smaller due to the dry weather, and the rain friday night did not enlarge it.  The arrowroot(I think) (the emergent plant with purple fllowers in a spike) makes it very difficult to see more than a few feet from shore, so hard to know what is going on, but in the one area that I can still see into the  water there are only a few tadpoles left, and these have lightened in color and developed legs.  Looks like this latest hatching class will be gone very soon, joining their conspecifics in the woods.    Yesterday I thought I saw a bullfrog tadpole, and the bullfrogs are still around, but again, with limited visibility it is hard to know.

Plenty of action over at the big pond.  It appears that all of let years tadpoles have now become froths, with hundreds around the edge of the pond.  While I was not watching the number of jumping tadpoles rapidly diminished and the number of frogs on shore expanded.  Looks to be nearly complete, and now in the water you are seeing the much smaller rings and lower jumps of the new crop of tadpoles, probably very similar to the bullfrog tadpoles I saw in the little pond.

I saw two muskrat one day this week, I saw a night heron this morning.  And walking home there were a pair of goldfinch along with the usual assortment of robins, jays, sparrows, flickers, hawks, and doves.

 

Tadpole update

This week the little pond in the NBG is shrinking fast while at the same time every day a new crop of tadpoles comes out of the water as little tree frogs.  It is the second year I have kept track of the timing, and this year the tadpoles are morphing a bit earlier than last year.

NBG Pond update 6/10/12

On a beautiful June morning I went over to the NBG to check out the life.  On my way in I saw an Oriole.  I think there is a pair in that neighborhood.  At the large pond I counted 14 turtles, which is the highest number I have ever counted there.
Several years ago 6 was the high for the year, last year it was 9.  They line up on the log sunning themselves as the morning starts to get warm.  They range in size from small to large, seemingly 4 or 5 ages classes represented.

The little pond is in full swing with its brief Gray Tree Frog tadpole season, with the first tadpoles appearing May 19, and this week the earliest of the hatchings, (3 or 4 several days apart producing noticeably different size classes) the largest tadpoles have  developed legs.  Tree frog tadpoles tend to either be swiftly on the move, eating, or lying on the bottom sort of dug into the mud.  There are hundreds if not thousands in the pond.

This year I have noticed a second type of tadpole which despite much observation time the previous two years, I had not seen before this year.  I think they are bullfrog tadpoles, as last summer a crop of about 20 bullfrogs came over from the larger pond as part of the new frog dispersal that follows the transformation from tadpole to frog. I know at least a  few of them made it thorough the winter.

The tadpoles are bigger, greener, and have a more transparent tail than do the tree frogs.  What they also do is move quite differently, with today the noticeable habit of hanging out tail down int he water column near the surface and occasionally breaking the surface readily observed.  This is exactly how the big second year tadpoles act in the larger pond, supplemented with large jumps by the big tadpoles.  Like breaching whales in miniature.  The new babies are not jumping yet, but you can see it coming.

I get to the NBG in the dark all winter, but rarely6 when the days are as long as they are now.  But after I got home front he EJ conference I went over to the NBG and just after 9 PM the little pond was loud with the calls of at least 2 different kinds of frogs.  Going ho have to check the recordings of what is what before I can offer identification of the callers.

 

 

Tadpole update June 3, 2012

I went down to the North Burial Ground twice today. It is a beautiful June day, it rained hard yesterday, but sunny and 70 today. At the big pond there were turtles sunning in the morning and we watched the fish. At the little pond I saw my first tadpole with legs.

When i went back this afternoon at the big pond I saw a Great Blue Heron eat two fish, once on my way in, and once on my way back from the little pond.

The little pond had filled back up after yesterday’s rain, and with that the Gray Tree Frog tadpoles were much closer to where you can stand with dry feet, and for some reason there were many more around than I have seen on any day so far this spring. There are still some very little ones, some larger ones, and some that are starting to sprout legs.

I also saw another kind of tadpole, just 3 of them. They were a different color, a lighter gray, with a clear tail, and yellow spots. They also swam differently from the tree frog tadpoles. The pond did have an invasion of Bullfrogs last fall, and they breed later, so it could be bullfrog tadpoles, but I need to do more research.

The other animals of interest today in the NBG included a hawk being chased by little birds, and oriole and a goldfinch.

 

Grey Tree Frog Tadpoles

With the drought this winter the pond where the Tree Frogs breed in the NBG had gone dry.  It was dry most of April, so I was concerned that there would be no breeding season this year.   The pond refilled in late April with the rains, so I was hopeful that it had filled in time.  On May 19 I saw tadpoles.  Last year the tadpoles appeared on May 12,

Keith Stokes and economic development

Sent this as a letter to the editor

To the editor,  I have seen a number of people praise Keith Stokes on his way out of the door at the RI Economic Development Corporation, but I think it bears remembering that 38 Studios is the second major blunder of this sort in his economic development career.  Mr. Stokes was completely taken in by the con men who convinced most of the economic development establishment of Rhode Island that they could be a successful gigantic container port.  Eventually the public won out and the con men were unmasked, but right until the end Mr Stokes was a proponent of their port.

38 Studios shows Mr. Stokes in the same light.  Completely taken in by the celebrity of Curt Schilling even though he also had no track record of success and wanted someone else’s money to build his fantasy scam.
I will note that that the problem in the economic development game that is Rhode Island is not just Keith Stokes, it is that the establishment in Rhode Island is still convinced that give aways to the 1% is economic development, while the reality is that only ecological healing, reducing inequality in income, and more democracy and transparency is the road forward economically.  I hope Governor Chafee takes this opportunity to rethink what he wants from the EDC, but it appears that he will find another economic development guy with their head in the sand about where the economy is really going.

Studio 38 strikes out

18 months ago or so when the RIEDC decided to give $75 million to Studio 38 so it could develop video games in RI instead of MA a number of people in Rhode Island, myself included , but also many people with extensive business experience, noted that this was a poor choice for the state.  the reasons people objected were varied.  In my case it is because I do not believe the video game industry is ever a good bet.  Other people objected to the state of RI doing anything that smacked of having an industrial policy.

I tend to be a believer in industrial policy, that the state should be making a smart use of the people’s money, and helping industries that will help the state in its development and job creation, but it is pretty clear that the RIEDC has a very poor track record in this area, and the video game industry is so uncertain that this was a long shot at best.

So it is with a little bit of I told you so, and a whole lot more regret that the state has wasted its money, that I have been reading the headlines and stories this week about the uncertain future and financial picture of 38 Studios.   This fiasco will give industrial policy a bad name when it should be another nail in the coffin of the EDC.  It also reflects rather poorly on Curt Schilling, the right winger who hypocritically took money from the state and squandered it. I would say he should have stuck to pitching but he was done with that by the time he took up video games.

beyond inequality

Not coincidentally the larger the inequality in the society,                  the more damaging the environmental ethics pursued.            Healing ecosystems, real democracy, an equitable income distribution, non violence, are all connected.

Response to comments on the French election

I find it interesting that neither the pro austerity camp nor the anti austerity camp are actually talking about what is really going on, which is ecosystem collapse and the need to create prosperity by shrinking the economy and our footprint.
My research suggests that the only true economic prosperity anyone is going to get is founded on several principles that no political party on the planet other than the Green Party is talking about.
1.  The ecology is larger than the economy and is always a factor.  No fish, no soil, no economy.
2. Ecological healing is critical, and in old industrial economies is the only way forward
3. Stop climate change and remediate and adapt to  what we can not fix by going to a zero carbon economy because there is already a massive amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
4.  Economies work better when there is less spread between rich and poor.  The purpose of government is to protect the poor from the rich and give voice to the voiceless.  Without that, hard times.
5. Democracy is critical as unless the poor and the indigenious have vested rights in their communities, which means they have a right to determine what happens in their communities and especially have the right to stop all inappropriate development the economy will tilt towards inequality and excessive pollution as well as hard times.
6. Forests are critical to the functioning of civilization.  No civilization has ever been built without ready access to an abundant wood supply.  Europe came out to fhe Black Death and the Middle ages with abundant forests that had regrown after the loss of 1/3 of the people.  The US was built upon forests.  Think San Francisco in 1906 and New Orleans in 2005.  SF had abundant forests for rebuilding, and rebuilt fast.  NOLA is in a place in whicvh forests were already seriously depleted, and rebuilding has been very slow.
China looks like an anomoly, because it has almost no intact forests, but it has simply displaced its wood cutting to the rest of southern Asia, to the severe detriment of the people of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, New Guinea, and Indonesia.  China gets rich, the forest people die.
7. Rebuild the soil.  Chemical agriculture is not cutting it.  Go organic and rebuild soil fertility, waterholding capacity, and carbon reserves. Yeilds will take care of themselves if the soil is taken care of.

Limits to Growth revisited

Greg Gerritt • I read Limits to Growth as a young person in the 1970′s, and loved reading Donella Meadows’ columns in the 1990s. This summation is a good reminder that we are in overshoot (using 140% of the annual biological production each year, which shows up as eroded soils, diminished forests, and empty seas among others, and 392 ppm CO2 and the warmest March ever) and that no one really knows where along the curve we are. Several things I have seen recently say that if anything we are so far into the BAU model that overshoot moves faster than ever and collapse seems more likely. i view my work as an effort to prevent collapse by managing the decline in our footprint, and our greedy ambitions.

What we are also seeing in this overshoot is growth moving around the world and leaving new and different places collapsing in its wake. I happen to live in one of the places where the ecological damage of industrialism started hundreds of years ago. And despite 50 years of effort no one has been able to return Rhode Island to the fast growth track.

I remind them that maybe we need another approach, based on the managed decline (not the language I use, but exactly the language of Limits to Growth, so i use it here) if we are to have prosperous communities.

I am getting an EPA award tomorrow for my work in developing a compost industry, To me my work with compost has always been about making sure we can grow food in the neighborhood when the trucks from California can no longer feed us. I do not think the EPA wants to really recognize the latter part of the previous sentence, but it motivates me and feeds more into the idea of ecological healing as the only way forward.

Seeing the video on the Limits to Growth revisited, is just a reminder that my job continues to be staying just a bit ahead of the curve on what folks are talking about so that next year it can be what they are talking about. and some years later is old hat to everyone.

As we say, the hippies were right about everything.

Live long and prosper

In what is likely to be a continuing shrinkage of still too high house prices, more and more mortgages coniniue to fail.  The only way to purge this from the system would have been to make the banks eat the toxic losses and have the owners take a new mortgage with payments based on what the house is really worth if the prices are not inflated by speculation and housing shortages, especially housing for the working folks.
Governments and communities need to prepare themselves for a smaller economy, expecially in the industrial west.  Low income countries will continue to see some income gains as long as they keep their forests and have wood for their communities, but high income countries are going to see lower standards of living and more equality in income if they are to survive, economically and ecologically.  Use less, share more, heal ecosystems, grow more food in the community.  Live long and prosper.